Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Add a bunch of EC NID/SN bindings for #732 #734

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 5, 2014
Merged

Add a bunch of EC NID/SN bindings for #732 #734

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 5, 2014

Conversation

reaperhulk
Copy link
Member

These NID/SN definitions should be present regardless of whether EC is enabled or not. Let's see if our CI agrees.

@reaperhulk
add a bunch of EC NID/SN bindings for pyca#732
1125a15 
These NID/SN definitions should be present regardless of whether EC is
enabled or not.
@jenkins-cryptography
Copy link

Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results: http://jenkins.cryptography.io/job/cryptography-pr-experimental/977/

@reaperhulk reaperhulk added this to the Third Release milestone Mar 5, 2014
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same when pulling 1125a15 on reaperhulk:more-ec-why-not into 826b374 on pyca:master.

alex added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 5, 2014
@alex
Merge pull request #734 from reaperhulk/more-ec-why-not
2bfc614 
Add a bunch of EC NID/SN bindings for #732
@alex alex merged commit 2bfc614 into pyca:master Mar 5, 2014
@reaperhulk reaperhulk deleted the more-ec-why-not branch March 7, 2014 22:14
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 2, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
backend
Milestone
Third Release
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
4 participants
@reaperhulk @jenkins-cryptography @coveralls @alex