Typo "Top Storage users" in Stats page

[rffontenelle]

The Stats page, line 30 (e.g. PyPI's Stats page) has the heading text Top storage users but it seems to be related to uses, rather than users. Maybe it is a typo?

[nlhkabu]

Thanks for flagging this @rffontenelle.
Maybe "Top projects by package size" would be a more accurate heading here?

[rffontenelle]

@nlhkabu I think "by package size" is not the most accurate, as the numbers are a "sum of their packages sizes", which means that the number on each line is a sum of all packages of that project.

[brainwane]

Good First Issue: This issue is good for first time contributors. If you've already contributed to Warehouse, work on another issue without this label instead. If there is not a corresponding pull request for this issue, it is up for grabs. For directions for getting set up, see our Getting Started Guide. If you are working on this issue and have questions, feel free to ask them here, #pypa-dev on Freenode, or the pypa-dev mailing list.

I think the wording should be:

Top storage users:
Ordered by the sum of all packages of each project

You'll need to change wording in warehouse/templates/pages/stats.html and find a way to add and style a subheading.

[lilivelazquezz]

Hello! I would love to work on this.

[raulgspan]

Hey, I started to look into this last night at the NY meetup as a first-time contributor, finally got my local env set up this morning... A few things:

• The second comment suggesting "projects" in the headline instead of "users" is right. The table is a list of "projects" so the heading should match. I would suggest "Top projects by total package size".

• "Ordered by the sum of all packages of each project" is a lot of text and seems unnecessary, it's pretty clear when you look at the table what it's ordered by. If anything, I'd suggest a small down arrow on the "Sum of release files (bytes)" column to indicate the sort order.

[brainwane]

@nlhkabu can you advise @lilivelazquezz and/or @raulgspan on a good approach?

[raulgspan]

Submitted PR 6767 for this: #6767