You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
brms supports joint model-based imputation by allowing some response variables to be marked partially missing using the mi() syntax:
xf <- bf(x | mi() ~ z + 1)
yf <- bf(y ~ mi(x) + z + 1)
It would be nice if brmp supported this behavior, and even turned it on by default without requiring the extra mi syntax. I believe we would have to address pyro-ppl/pyro#1106 upstream in Pyro, after which the code generation to support this feature would be a small extension of #42.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
brms supports joint model-based imputation by allowing some response variables to be marked partially missing using the
mi()
syntax:It would be nice if brmp supported this behavior, and even turned it on by default without requiring the extra
mi
syntax. I believe we would have to address pyro-ppl/pyro#1106 upstream in Pyro, after which the code generation to support this feature would be a small extension of #42.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: