Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Pollutant Subcatchment Results Getters and Setters #52

Closed
bemcdonnell opened this issue Jul 10, 2017 · 3 comments
Closed

Add Pollutant Subcatchment Results Getters and Setters #52

bemcdonnell opened this issue Jul 10, 2017 · 3 comments

Comments

@bemcdonnell
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@bemcdonnell bemcdonnell added this to the v5.2.0 milestone Jul 10, 2017
@bemcdonnell
Copy link
Member Author

@SimonDelmas Lets begin our discussion here!

@bemcdonnell
Copy link
Member Author

@abhiramm7, you might be interested in this discussion as well.

@dickinsonre
Copy link

@bemcdonnell have you thought of using SWMM5 tracers in the control rules? You can then use RTC rules based on the percentage of WWF. I am not sure if you attended the CHI conference where the Austrian university discussed this but we had a SWMM List Server code exchanged. My code seems to be gone but here is the original thread https://www.openswmm.org/Topic/5208/5-1-010-bug-hotstart-files

@bemcdonnell bemcdonnell changed the title Add Pollutant Node and Link Results Getters Add Pollutant Subcatchment, Node, and Link Results Getters Aug 24, 2017
@bemcdonnell bemcdonnell changed the title Add Pollutant Subcatchment, Node, and Link Results Getters Add Pollutant Subcatchment, Node, and Link Results Getters and Setters Aug 24, 2017
@bemcdonnell bemcdonnell changed the title Add Pollutant Subcatchment, Node, and Link Results Getters and Setters Add Pollutant Subcatchment Results Getters and Setters Feb 15, 2018
michaeltryby added a commit to SWMM-Project/swmm-solver that referenced this issue Aug 21, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants