Document which pytest features work with unittest
#2656
Conversation
|
@nicoddemus good work, can you please add a paragraph on subtests as well |
Definitely, thanks! |
nicoddemus
force-pushed
the
unittest-features
branch
from
a5ce7d8
to
15cdf13
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Few comments on wording and overall structure, but apart from that great work @nicoddemus! 📝 👏
doc/en/unittest.rst
Outdated
| to overwrite ``debug`` in the same way (this is also true for standard | ||
| unittest). | ||
| ``pytest`` supports running Python `unittest.py style`_ tests out of the box. | ||
| It's meant for leveraging existing ``unittest``-style test suites |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think, it would be better to stick to one name:
`unittest.py style`_
vs.
``unittest``-style
doc/en/unittest.rst
Outdated
| ``pytest`` supports running Python `unittest.py style`_ tests out of the box. | ||
| It's meant for leveraging existing ``unittest``-style test suites | ||
| to use pytest as a test runner and also allow to incrementally adapt | ||
| the test suite to take full advantage of pytest features. |
doc/en/unittest.rst
Outdated
| to use pytest as a test runner and also allow to incrementally adapt | ||
| the test suite to take full advantage of pytest features. | ||
|
|
||
| To run an existing ``unittest``-style test suite using ``pytest``, simply type:: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove simply. It's redundant 😄
doc/en/unittest.rst
Outdated
| Benefits | ||
| -------- | ||
|
|
||
| You can make use of several pytest features, most without changing any existing code: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
You can make use of several pytest features, in most cases without having to modify existing code:
doc/en/unittest.rst
Outdated
| .. _`setUpModule/tearDownModule`: https://docs.python.org/3/library/unittest.html#setupmodule-and-teardownmodule | ||
| .. _`subtests`: https://docs.python.org/3/library/unittest.html#distinguishing-test-iterations-using-subtests | ||
|
|
||
| Pytest currently does not support the following ``unittest`` features: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Up to this point pytest does not have support for the following unittest features:
doc/en/unittest.rst
Outdated
| Mixing pytest fixtures into unittest.TestCase style tests | ||
| ----------------------------------------------------------- | ||
|
|
||
| pytest features in ``unittest.TestCase`` subclasses |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hmm I wonder if we can improve the structure of this document:
- unittest.TestCase Support
- Benefits
- Limitations
- pytest features in
unittest.TestCasesubclasses - Mixing pytest fixtures into
unittest.TestCasesubclasses using marks - Using autouse fixtures and accessing other fixtures
- ...
I might be better to have an introduction at the top level and mention some of the limitations and link to the according section and then list some of the most important unittest features that pytest supports?! 🤔
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yeah I agree the structure is not very appealing.
We might not use RST sessions, just make the title bold instead and list benefits/limitations etc in the introduction text.
Btw you're welcome to push to my branch if you want to take a stab at this yourself. 😉
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I know, my friend, I know 😢
Don't have much time for FOSS at the moment. Otherwise I'd happily work on this with you.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
No worries! I will take a stab at this again later then. 👍
|
@hackebrot pushed requested changes. |
|
Great work @nicoddemus! 👍 |
|
great collaboration, thanks |
Fix #2626