You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
So, 4.1.0 has settled for a bit, and I think that a 4.1.1 release is appropriate for the Exif/Dpi (#2484) issue and the Python 3.6.0/1 (#2479) issue.
I've had a look at https://bugs.python.org/issue29943 again, and I'm not sure where the resolution of this is going to fall, but I'm leaning to some sort of workaround on our end, either a friendly notification or undefining the symbol. (Though, the undefining solution is going to live on far past the eventual resolution in Python)
As a sort of delayed post-mortem for the 4.1.0 release, it's becoming clear that no one installing our code is really prepared to do the compilation. Binaries are the thing, and we'd save support issues by pushing the new release to pypi all in one shot, rather than as source, then two or three different sets of binaries.
So, if @cgohlke is ok with it, I'd like to change the release procedure to:
So, 4.1.0 has settled for a bit, and I think that a 4.1.1 release is appropriate for the Exif/Dpi (#2484) issue and the Python 3.6.0/1 (#2479) issue.
I've had a look at https://bugs.python.org/issue29943 again, and I'm not sure where the resolution of this is going to fall, but I'm leaning to some sort of workaround on our end, either a friendly notification or undefining the symbol. (Though, the undefining solution is going to live on far past the eventual resolution in Python)
As a sort of delayed post-mortem for the 4.1.0 release, it's becoming clear that no one installing our code is really prepared to do the compilation. Binaries are the thing, and we'd save support issues by pushing the new release to pypi all in one shot, rather than as source, then two or three different sets of binaries.
So, if @cgohlke is ok with it, I'd like to change the release procedure to:
I don't know if @cgohlke is pulling from pypi, or git checkout or zips or what -- so that's the uncertainty in this plan.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: