Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix bltinmodule.c for 64-bit platforms #32441

Closed
tmick mannequin opened this issue Jun 7, 2000 · 7 comments
Closed

fix bltinmodule.c for 64-bit platforms #32441

tmick mannequin opened this issue Jun 7, 2000 · 7 comments
Assignees

Comments

@tmick
Copy link
Mannequin

tmick mannequin commented Jun 7, 2000

BPO 400518
Nosy @gvanrossum
Files
  • None: None
  • Note: these values reflect the state of the issue at the time it was migrated and might not reflect the current state.

    Show more details

    GitHub fields:

    assignee = 'https://github.com/gvanrossum'
    closed_at = <Date 2000-06-28.21:19:40.000>
    created_at = <Date 2000-06-07.03:21:01.000>
    labels = []
    title = 'fix bltinmodule.c for 64-bit platforms'
    updated_at = <Date 2000-06-28.21:19:40.000>
    user = 'https://bugs.python.org/tmick'

    bugs.python.org fields:

    activity = <Date 2000-06-28.21:19:40.000>
    actor = 'tmick'
    assignee = 'gvanrossum'
    closed = True
    closed_date = None
    closer = None
    components = ['None']
    creation = <Date 2000-06-07.03:21:01.000>
    creator = 'tmick'
    dependencies = []
    files = ['2449']
    hgrepos = []
    issue_num = 400518
    keywords = ['patch']
    message_count = 7.0
    messages = ['32761', '32762', '32763', '32764', '32765', '32766', '32767']
    nosy_count = 2.0
    nosy_names = ['gvanrossum', 'tmick']
    pr_nums = []
    priority = 'normal'
    resolution = None
    stage = None
    status = 'closed'
    superseder = None
    type = None
    url = 'https://bugs.python.org/issue400518'
    versions = []

    @tmick
    Copy link
    Mannequin Author

    tmick mannequin commented Jun 7, 2000

    No description provided.

    @tmick tmick mannequin closed this as completed Jun 7, 2000
    @tmick tmick mannequin assigned gvanrossum Jun 7, 2000
    @tmick tmick mannequin closed this as completed Jun 7, 2000
    @tmick tmick mannequin assigned gvanrossum Jun 7, 2000
    @tmick
    Copy link
    Mannequin Author

    tmick mannequin commented Jun 7, 2000

    I confirm that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, this
    contribution is free of any claims of third parties under
    copyright, patent or other rights or interests ("claims"). To
    the extent that I have any such claims, I hereby grant to CNRI a
    nonexclusive, irrevocable, royalty-free, worldwide license to
    reproduce, distribute, perform and/or display publicly, prepare
    derivative versions, and otherwise use this contribution as part
    of the Python software and its related documentation, or any
    derivative versions thereof, at no cost to CNRI or its licensed
    users, and to authorize others to do so.

    I acknowledge that CNRI may, at its sole discretion, decide
    whether or not to incorporate this contribution in the Python
    software and its related documentation. I further grant CNRI
    permission to use my name and other identifying information
    provided to CNRI by me for use in connection with the Python
    software and its related documentation.

    @tmick
    Copy link
    Mannequin Author

    tmick mannequin commented Jun 7, 2000

    Various small fixes to the builtin module to ensure no buffer overflows.

    @gvanrossum
    Copy link
    Member

    We'll have to trust Trent that this works on 64-bit Windows...

    @tmick
    Copy link
    Mannequin Author

    tmick mannequin commented Jun 27, 2000

    Muuwaaaahhhaaaa!
    -- member of live 32-bits or die

    p.s. But, as a theoretical exercise, this looks okay to you I presume.

    @gvanrossum
    Copy link
    Member

    OK. Note that the chakge to id() means that id() can now return a long -- this should normally be alright but it's possible that it could break code that expects an int. Good enough for a beta.

    @tmick
    Copy link
    Mannequin Author

    tmick mannequin commented Jun 28, 2000

    Note that the chakge to id() means that id() can now
    return a long -- this should normally be alright but
    it's possible that it could break code that expects an
    int

    Yes, I asked Tim about that and he said, correctly, that the guarantee is only that an integral value is returned and that PyLong qualifies.

    @ezio-melotti ezio-melotti transferred this issue from another repository Apr 9, 2022
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Labels
    None yet
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    1 participant