Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[DTensor] Ensured grad_placements was tuple #113925

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Nov 17, 2023

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/113925

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ No Failures

As of commit 03e7d12 with merge base 140c54e (image):
💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

Copy link
Contributor

@wanchaol wanchaol left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm!

@awgu awgu marked this pull request as ready for review November 20, 2023 17:32
@awgu awgu added ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request release notes: distributed (dtensor) release notes category labels Nov 20, 2023
pytorchmergebot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 20, 2023
pytorchmergebot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 21, 2023
This is a replacement for #113922. I think we can still leave the check for negative shard dimension in `compute_local_shape_and_global_offset` and replace the normalization logic with an assert. This should provide us a stack trace to see which user-facing API did not normalize the dim as expected.
Pull Request resolved: #114141
Approved by: https://github.com/wanchaol
ghstack dependencies: #113919, #113924, #114134, #113925, #113930
pytorchmergebot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 21, 2023
**Overview**
Generally, I think we can try to freeze as many of these classes used in DTensor sharding propagation as possible so that we can cache hashes. This PR targets hashing `DTensorSpec`, which turns out to be relatively expensive.

**Details**
It looks like `tensor_meta` is only updated in `_wrap_output_spec_tensor_meta`, which only runs if the propagation was not cached:
https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/blob/ae94c7e491e22f58d3df66571c1a568e51d70acd/torch/distributed/_tensor/sharding_prop.py#L137
https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/blob/ae94c7e491e22f58d3df66571c1a568e51d70acd/torch/distributed/_tensor/sharding_prop.py#L153
In that case, I think we can cache the hash for the `DTensorSpec` and only update it when one of the hashed attributes changes, which we only really expect to happen for `tensor_meta`.

To ensure correctness, we need that all hashed attributes are immutable.
- `DeviceMesh` caches its hash: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/blob/a9134fa99a8986adf478a12db2ea5729d24554db/torch/distributed/_device_mesh.py#L181
- This PR makes each `Placement` a frozen `dataclass`, making them immutable (relying on the fact that they do not have references to any mutable objects).
- `TensorMeta` is a `NamedTuple` of `torch.Size`, `Tuple[int, ...]`, and `torch.dtype`, so it is immutable: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/blob/9916d8a9eaaf2c05c131f2a2dbe9eabeeaa9dffc/torch/distributed/_tensor/placement_types.py#L369-L375

**Example**
For some simple small GPT model:
Before: 0.125 ms
<img width="509" alt="Screenshot 2023-11-16 at 10 08 05 PM" src="https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/assets/31054793/10e59401-f635-431f-80b5-1b48df3a706e">

After: 0.048 ms
<img width="294" alt="Screenshot 2023-11-16 at 10 08 47 PM" src="https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/assets/31054793/09a3b0b9-f68c-4afc-bca1-c29a4b01c2fb">

The overall Adam CPU step time decreases from 7.647 ms to 6.451 ms.
Pull Request resolved: #113915
Approved by: https://github.com/wanchaol
ghstack dependencies: #113919, #113924, #114134, #113925, #113930, #114141
pytorchmergebot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 21, 2023
This is a nit change to save one `isinstance` call for when `dim` is not `None` but the placement is not `Shard`.
Pull Request resolved: #114140
Approved by: https://github.com/Skylion007, https://github.com/wanchaol
ghstack dependencies: #113919, #113924, #114134, #113925, #113930, #114141, #113915
pytorchmergebot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 22, 2023
This is a forward fix for #113781.

We lazily compute the hash so that we do not try to compute the hash on `SymInt`s (for the stride) during Dynamo tracing.

Tested via:
```
python test/distributed/_tensor/test_dtensor_compile.py -k test_2d_fsdp_tp_ac_compile
```
Pull Request resolved: #114322
Approved by: https://github.com/wanchaol
ghstack dependencies: #113919, #113924, #114134, #113925, #113930, #114141, #113915, #114140
@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot deleted the gh/awgu/460/head branch November 24, 2023 15:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request Merged release notes: distributed (dtensor) release notes category
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants