Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

upsample_bilinear2d and upsample_bicubic2d: port to structured #52012

Closed
wants to merge 10 commits into from

Conversation

bdhirsh
Copy link
Contributor

@bdhirsh bdhirsh commented Feb 10, 2021

Going ahead and porting the other upsample ops to structured since they follow a similar pattern.

Stack from ghstack:

Differential Revision: D26356329

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

facebook-github-bot commented Feb 10, 2021

💊 CI failures summary and remediations

As of commit dfaa5ab (more details on the Dr. CI page):


  • 1/1 failures possibly* introduced in this PR
    • 1/1 non-scanned failure(s)

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI (expand for details).Follow this link to opt-out of these comments for your Pull Requests.

Please report bugs/suggestions to the (internal) Dr. CI Users group.

bdhirsh added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 10, 2021
ghstack-source-id: 4dc26276076057761fbf3c74f7cb7642fa638259
Pull Request resolved: #52012
…red"

Going ahead and porting the other upsample ops to structured since they follow a similar pattern.


Differential Revision: [D26356329](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D26356329)

[ghstack-poisoned]
…red"

Going ahead and porting the other upsample ops to structured since they follow a similar pattern.


Differential Revision: [D26356329](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D26356329)

[ghstack-poisoned]
…red"

Going ahead and porting the other upsample ops to structured since they follow a similar pattern.


Differential Revision: [D26356329](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D26356329)

[ghstack-poisoned]
…red"

Going ahead and porting the other upsample ops to structured since they follow a similar pattern.


Differential Revision: [D26356329](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D26356329)

[ghstack-poisoned]
…red"

Going ahead and porting the other upsample ops to structured since they follow a similar pattern.


Differential Revision: [D26356329](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D26356329)

[ghstack-poisoned]
…red"

Going ahead and porting the other upsample ops to structured since they follow a similar pattern.


Differential Revision: [D26356329](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D26356329)

[ghstack-poisoned]
…red"

Going ahead and porting the other upsample ops to structured since they follow a similar pattern.


Differential Revision: [D26356329](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D26356329)

[ghstack-poisoned]
…red"

Going ahead and porting the other upsample ops to structured since they follow a similar pattern.


Differential Revision: [D26356329](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D26356329)

[ghstack-poisoned]
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 21, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #52012 (dfaa5ab) into gh/bdhirsh/78/base (cad2e7b) will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@                 Coverage Diff                 @@
##           gh/bdhirsh/78/base   #52012   +/-   ##
===================================================
  Coverage               80.76%   80.76%           
===================================================
  Files                    1969     1969           
  Lines                  216005   215958   -47     
===================================================
- Hits                   174454   174417   -37     
+ Misses                  41551    41541   -10     

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@bdhirsh merged this pull request in d659477.

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot deleted the gh/bdhirsh/78/head branch February 26, 2021 15:18
output_height,
output_width);

output.resize_({nbatch, channels, output_height, output_width}, input.suggest_memory_format());
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks like we don't suggest memory_format here either, the same as in https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/52065/files#r589557711

cc @vfdev-5

aocsa pushed a commit to Quansight/pytorch that referenced this pull request Mar 15, 2021
…h#52012)

Summary: Pull Request resolved: pytorch#52012

Test Plan: Imported from OSS

Reviewed By: ezyang

Differential Revision: D26356329

Pulled By: bdhirsh

fbshipit-source-id: 8f974224799493e3172fe5dff3fbd43af8c09722
xsacha pushed a commit to xsacha/pytorch that referenced this pull request Mar 31, 2021
…h#52012)

Summary: Pull Request resolved: pytorch#52012

Test Plan: Imported from OSS

Reviewed By: ezyang

Differential Revision: D26356329

Pulled By: bdhirsh

fbshipit-source-id: 8f974224799493e3172fe5dff3fbd43af8c09722
@bdhirsh bdhirsh changed the title port upsample_bilinear2d and upsample_bicubic2d to structured upsample_bilinear2d and upsample_bicubic2d: port to structured (#52012) May 24, 2021
@bdhirsh bdhirsh changed the title upsample_bilinear2d and upsample_bicubic2d: port to structured (#52012) upsample_bilinear2d and upsample_bicubic2d: port to structured May 24, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants