New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix negative channel 3A slope calibration coefficient in AVHRR reader #2123
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #2123 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 93.88% 93.88% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 283 283
Lines 43093 43092 -1
==========================================
- Hits 40458 40457 -1
Misses 2635 2635
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
So the original fix was for Channel 2 (at index 1) and this is for 3a (at index 2). Given that it took so long to discover the issue with Channel 2 and that it took an email from Nigel Atkinson, do you @ninahakansson have any idea if any other channels (channel 1?) suffer from this? |
I think is could in principle also happen to channel 1. So maybe we should just apply it to all visible channels? |
Yes, please do that, also just agreed via mail by Nigel Atkinson (NWPSAF) |
AAPP treat all visible channels the same
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me. One question, is it OK for IR bands slopes to be negative?
Is this ready to merge? It seems the codecov failure is due to the total number of lines of code being reduced? |
Handle negative slopes for 3A in calibration the same way as for channel 1
AUTHORS.md
if not there already