New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use Set method insted of On and Off method #3001
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #3001 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 94.31% 94.31% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 76 76
Lines 16566 16557 -9
==========================================
- Hits 15625 15616 -9
Misses 941 941 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good catch. I have some suggestions. It is better to have an explicit code in "else" case.
Co-authored-by: Tetsuo Koyama <tkoyama010@gmail.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Batch suggestions applied are causing test failures. Looking into issue |
@tkoyama010 problem solved. Ready to merge. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM. Thanks!
Overview
Resolves #2769
Details
Only conditional statements in which
On()
andOff()
statements were used have been refactored.