Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Pyramids are not build if tifw contains rotations #11782

Closed
qgib opened this issue Jun 6, 2009 · 11 comments
Closed

Pyramids are not build if tifw contains rotations #11782

qgib opened this issue Jun 6, 2009 · 11 comments
Labels
Bug Either a bug report, or a bug fix. Let's hope for the latter! Rasters Related to general raster layer handling (not specific data formats)

Comments

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor

qgib commented Jun 6, 2009

Author Name: Maxim Dubinin (@simgislab)
Original Redmine Issue: 1722
Affected QGIS version: master
Redmine category:rasters


If tfw file contains rotations terms, pyramids are not build with the message: "Not supported on this type of raster".

Example attached, see lines 2 and 3, not equal to 0.
Replicated in 1.0.2 and 1.2-trunk


@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented Jul 27, 2009

Author Name: ersts - (ersts -)


This is because the image is warped when it is loaded and considered a 'warped virtual dataset'. The image being drawn is not the original base image, though we do still have a pointer to that base image.

It seems like pyramids could be build for the based image, and then reloaded and rewarped again, but I need to check with the GDAL folks to see if pyramids are supported at all with virtual datasets.


  • status_id was changed from Open to In Progress

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented Jul 27, 2009

Author Name: Maxim Dubinin (@simgislab)


I think the pyramids should be built for the base raster.

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented Jul 27, 2009

Author Name: Frank Warmerdam - (Frank Warmerdam -)


Overviews can actually be built on vrt warped images however that doesn't work in the QGIS case where the warped VRT is actually just temporary - not saved to disk.

We could also build overviews on the underlying image however at this time the GDAL warp api underlying warped VRTs does not take advantage of overviews.

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented Jul 27, 2009

Author Name: ersts - (ersts -)


Replying to [comment:5 warmerdam]:

We could also build overviews on the underlying image however at this time the GDAL warp api underlying warped VRTs does not take advantage of overviews.

Thanks Frank, that was the nugget I was looking for. So for now I guess we will just keep the ticket open and watch the following ticket

http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/2076

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented Dec 16, 2011

Author Name: Giovanni Manghi (@gioman)


  • fixed_version_id was changed from Version 1.7.0 to Version 1.7.4

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented Apr 16, 2012

Author Name: Paolo Cavallini (@pcav)


  • fixed_version_id was changed from Version 1.7.4 to Version 1.8.0
  • version was configured as master
  • crashes_corrupts_data was configured as 0

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented Sep 4, 2012

Author Name: Paolo Cavallini (@pcav)


  • fixed_version_id was changed from Version 1.8.0 to Version 2.0.0

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented Oct 4, 2012

Author Name: Giovanni Manghi (@gioman)


  • status_id was changed from In Progress to Open
  • pull_request_patch_supplied was configured as 0
  • status_info was changed from 0 to
  • operating_system was changed from All to
  • assigned_to_id removed ersts

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented Jun 28, 2014

Author Name: Jürgen Fischer (@jef-n)


  • fixed_version_id was changed from Version 2.0.0 to Future Release - Lower Priority

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented Apr 30, 2017

Author Name: Giovanni Manghi (@gioman)


  • regression was configured as 0
  • easy_fix was configured as 0

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented Mar 9, 2019

Author Name: Giovanni Manghi (@gioman)


End of life notice: QGIS 2.18 LTR
*
Source:*
http://blog.qgis.org/2019/03/09/end-of-life-notice-qgis-2-18-ltr/


  • resolution was changed from to end of life
  • status_id was changed from Open to Closed

@qgib qgib closed this as completed Mar 9, 2019
@qgib qgib added Bug Either a bug report, or a bug fix. Let's hope for the latter! Rasters Related to general raster layer handling (not specific data formats) labels May 24, 2019
@qgib qgib added this to the Future Release - Lower Priority milestone May 24, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Bug Either a bug report, or a bug fix. Let's hope for the latter! Rasters Related to general raster layer handling (not specific data formats)
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant