Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

WMS "identify features" results window barely readable #12415

Closed
qgib opened this issue Jan 11, 2010 · 1 comment
Closed

WMS "identify features" results window barely readable #12415

qgib opened this issue Jan 11, 2010 · 1 comment
Labels
Bug Either a bug report, or a bug fix. Let's hope for the latter! Data Provider Related to specific vector, raster or mesh data providers
Milestone
Version 1.5.0

Comments

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor

qgib commented Jan 11, 2010

Author Name: Giovanni Manghi (@gioman)
Original Redmine Issue: 2355

Redmine category:web_services_clients/wms
Assignee: Marco Hugentobler

Add a WMS layer and use the "identify features" tool.

If the original vector layer has a table of attributes with enough columns, than the readibility of the identify results is scare, as values are presented horizontally (see attached image).
@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented Jun 11, 2010

Author Name: Giovanni Manghi (@gioman)

fixed recently

  • resolution was configured as fixed
  • status_id was changed from Open to Closed

@qgib qgib added Bug Either a bug report, or a bug fix. Let's hope for the latter! Data Provider Related to specific vector, raster or mesh data providers labels May 24, 2019
@qgib qgib added this to the Version 1.5.0 milestone May 24, 2019
@qgib qgib closed this as completed May 24, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Bug Either a bug report, or a bug fix. Let's hope for the latter! Data Provider Related to specific vector, raster or mesh data providers
Projects
None yet
Milestone
Version 1.5.0
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@qgib