We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Author Name: magerlin - (magerlin -) Original Redmine Issue: 9552 Affected QGIS version: 2.0.1
When doing this calculation in field calculator on a shape file:
FromToStop = 100000 * From_stop + To_stop
results are sometimes negative even though From_stop and TO_stop are positive.
Error occurs both with integers and real numbers.
Directly writing a 10 digit number in an attribute in Field Calculater gives strange results too at least if the field is real 20.0:
Writing 1111111111 is OK but writing 2222222222 returns the value -2147483648 after saving.
See more here: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Error-in-simple-calculation-in-Field-Calculator-td5102486.html
I am using version 2.0.1 installed from OSGeo4W.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Author Name: magerlin - (magerlin -)
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
Author Name: magerlin - (magerlin -)
Original Redmine Issue: 9552
Affected QGIS version: 2.0.1
When doing this calculation in field calculator on a shape file:
FromToStop = 100000 * From_stop + To_stop
results are sometimes negative even though From_stop and TO_stop are positive.
Error occurs both with integers and real numbers.
Directly writing a 10 digit number in an attribute in Field Calculater gives strange results too at least if the field is real 20.0:
Writing 1111111111 is OK but writing 2222222222 returns the value -2147483648 after saving.
See more here: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Error-in-simple-calculation-in-Field-Calculator-td5102486.html
I am using version 2.0.1 installed from OSGeo4W.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: