Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve the "Handle bad layers" window : better place the "browser" button #19378

Closed
qgib opened this issue Aug 12, 2014 · 7 comments
Closed
Labels
Feature Request Feedback Waiting on the submitter for answers

Comments

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor

qgib commented Aug 12, 2014

Author Name: Harrissou Santanna (@DelazJ)
Original Redmine Issue: 11039

Redmine category:unknown


Hi,
In the previous releases, I used to click on the missing layer row and it opens a browser to select its valid path.
The current window offers the possibility to directly rewrite the path in the dialog (and copy/paste), which is really a great improvement when you use database tables or the same folder.

But sometimes, you may need to browse your folders to find where is the valid file and double-clicking on the row does no more do that. It tooks time for me to realize (i did it when reporting this issue by reading #19042 although i've been moving my datas for many weeks) that under the dialog, there was a "browser" button for that. I don't think that it is really intuitive for the user, as this button is among those closing/validating the dialog.

Wouldn't it be better to have at the end of each missing file row a browser button (the push button one with just three dots)? The user directly knows what it does as it becomes IMHO more intuitive.

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented Aug 12, 2014

Author Name: Jürgen Fischer (@jef-n)


Not all datasources are file based. And the "Browse button..." allows to set the directory of multiple selected datasources at once.

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented Aug 12, 2014

Author Name: Harrissou Santanna (@DelazJ)


Jürgen Fischer wrote:

Not all datasources are file based.

Yes I do agree! So maybe, only those "browsable" should have that button...unless it complicates things.

And the "Browse button..." allows to set the directory of multiple selected datasources at once.

It can still work like that as, if I'm not wrong, in the current behavior, the files that will be affected by the modifications might be selected before browsing. The user will select many rows and push on one of their "browse" button to select the right folder. It's "just" a matter of documentation.

My main point is that it was not so obvious to me that the "Browse" button was designed to browse file for the selected row(s). I haven't really remarked it, I think, supposing that the buttons that are below just manage the whole window.

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented Apr 30, 2017

Author Name: Giovanni Manghi (@gioman)


  • easy_fix was configured as 0

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented Sep 22, 2017

Author Name: Jürgen Fischer (@jef-n)


  • category_id was configured as Unknown

@roya0045
Copy link
Contributor

@DelazJ is this still a valid concern?

@gioman gioman added the Feedback Waiting on the submitter for answers label Mar 14, 2020
@DelazJ
Copy link
Contributor

DelazJ commented Mar 15, 2020

Let's close it. I don't know if it works with non file-based data, but the "Auto find" seems to be a more obvious, prominent tool imho. Thanks

@roya0045
Copy link
Contributor

@DelazJ auto-find only work on file-based data. It could be updated but I'm not sure if its a good idea to implement other cases and how to navigate through them.

@gioman gioman closed this as completed Mar 17, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Feature Request Feedback Waiting on the submitter for answers
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants