You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Microlens has a quite a bit smaller dependency footprint than lens, but is often a drop-in replacement. See https://github.com/fosskers/microlens-aeson/#microlens-aeson for a visual comparison of the *-aeson versions. Would it be possible to have xlsx depend on microlens instead? It'd shorten our clean-build times quite a bit :)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I think the library doesn't use advanced features of lens so should be compatible with microlens but I don't think there is enough motivation to change the default lens library. Quite a lot of applications use it already or it could come with some other dependency.
But I'm OK with having a Cabal flag with which lens could be replaced with microlens if that won't change API significantly
Microlens has a quite a bit smaller dependency footprint than lens, but is often a drop-in replacement. See https://github.com/fosskers/microlens-aeson/#microlens-aeson for a visual comparison of the *-aeson versions. Would it be possible to have xlsx depend on microlens instead? It'd shorten our clean-build times quite a bit :)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: