-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 984
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Deprecating cross_entropy_benchmarking and grid_parallel_two_qubit_xeb #5424
Deprecating cross_entropy_benchmarking and grid_parallel_two_qubit_xeb #5424
Conversation
- cirq.experiments.cross_entropy_benchmarking is redundant and not easy to adapt. - cirq.experiments.grid_parallel_two_qubit_xeb moved to recirq.benchmarks.xeb - Also delete cross_entropy_benchmarking example This is part of quantumlib#3775.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, minor nit might be to break down some of the higher count assert_deprecated
s just to make sure we aren't double warning in some places and not warning at all in others.
# Sanity test that plot runs. | ||
ax = plt.subplot() | ||
results_1.plot(ax) | ||
with cirq.testing.assert_deprecated(_DEPRECATION_MESSAGE, deadline='v0.16', count=10): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could we use a few more contexts with lower counts that are a bit more tightly coupled to the things that are deprecated ? Just want to make sure we aren't accidentally raising two deprecations on some fxn calls.
quantumlib#5424) - cirq.experiments.cross_entropy_benchmarking is redundant and not easy to adapt. - cirq.experiments.grid_parallel_two_qubit_xeb moved to recirq.benchmarks.xeb - Also delete cross_entropy_benchmarking example This is part of quantumlib#3775.
to adapt.
recirq.benchmarks.xeb
This is part of #3775.