Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add single-qubit detuning parameters to CouplerPulse #5971

Merged
merged 8 commits into from Jan 5, 2023

Conversation

wcourtney
Copy link
Collaborator

Clone of u/maffoo/coupler-pulse with test fixes.

@CirqBot CirqBot added the size: M 50< lines changed <250 label Dec 20, 2022
@wcourtney
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Not sure of the etiquette here (and whether I should merge back into the original), but this extends and fixes the tests in #5965.

@wcourtney wcourtney marked this pull request as ready for review December 20, 2022 23:18
@wcourtney wcourtney requested review from a team, vtomole, cduck and verult as code owners December 20, 2022 23:18
'rise_time',
'padding_time',
'q0_detune_mhz',
'q1_detune_mhz',
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Will this fail to deserialize old CouplerPulse objects without these values?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I added a test that demonstrates that deserialization continues to work: test_coupler_pulse_json_deserialization_defaults_on_missing_fields

@wcourtney wcourtney changed the title U/wcourtney/coupler pulse Add single-qubit detuning parameters to CouplerPulse Jan 3, 2023
@wcourtney wcourtney merged commit b014036 into master Jan 5, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
size: M 50< lines changed <250
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants