Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 8, 2022. It is now read-only.

mcu_sleep(x); Low limit on "x" value #5

Closed
eficker opened this issue Aug 30, 2016 · 4 comments
Closed

mcu_sleep(x); Low limit on "x" value #5

eficker opened this issue Aug 30, 2016 · 4 comments
Labels

Comments

@eficker
Copy link

eficker commented Aug 30, 2016

As far as I can tell, mcu_sleep() does not seem to accept values greater than 12000 (2 minutes). When a value higher than 12000 is used, the mcu_sleep() command seems to max out at 2 minutes. For a workaround multiple mcu_sleep(12000); statements can be used in a single program.

It seems like this should not be the case, so I thought I'd raise the flag.

@jeez
Copy link
Contributor

jeez commented Aug 30, 2016

Thanks, but not sure I follow, @eficker... We have no functions called mcu_sleep(). The closest to that are the power_soc_sleep() function, which in turn don't get any parameter.

Can you please point to the header file + line to which function you are referring to?

@eficker
Copy link
Author

eficker commented Aug 30, 2016

Perhaps I'm posting in the wrong repo. This is a function to control the MCU from C++ using the Intel provided IDE (Eclipse). I'm still trying to figure out all the pieces to the Edison in general and looks like there are several layers to just the MCU as well. Any chance you can point me in the right direction? @jeez

@jeez
Copy link
Contributor

jeez commented Aug 30, 2016

@eficker I believe so, yes. This is the repo for the HAL of Quark MCUs. Currently the support we provide is for Quark D2000 and Quark SE. These are not in Edison as far as I can remember.

I will try to point you to the right direction, sure. Which IDE and which version are you using? (is it ISSM?)
Have you tried the Edison Forums? --> https://communities.intel.com/community/tech/edison

@jeez
Copy link
Contributor

jeez commented Aug 31, 2016

I will close this issue for now, @eficker, as it doesn't apply to this code base. I hope the Edison Forum helps you out, let me know if otherwise.

@jeez jeez closed this as completed Aug 31, 2016
@jeez jeez added the invalid label Aug 31, 2016
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants