Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

smallrye-stork - Consider changing LoadBalancer to CDI bean instead of SPI #18

Closed
cescoffier opened this issue Nov 10, 2022 · 1 comment
Closed

smallrye-stork - Consider changing LoadBalancer to CDI bean instead of SPI #18

cescoffier opened this issue Nov 10, 2022 · 1 comment
Assignees
@cescoffier
Labels
area/stork kind/epic

Comments

@cescoffier
Copy link
Member

(From smallrye/smallrye-stork#64)
it's easier to test CDI beans than SPI providers.
It could be nice to have both, a possibility to add LoadBalancers by creating CDI beans and by SPI

upstream-organization: SmallRye
upstream-repository: smallrye-stork
upstream-issue: 64
upstream-status: open
upstream-milestone: unplanned
@cescoffier cescoffier self-assigned this Nov 10, 2022
@cescoffier cescoffier mentioned this issue Nov 10, 2022
Closed
@cescoffier
Copy link
Member Author

Fixed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@cescoffier cescoffier

Labels
area/stork kind/epic
Projects
Quarkus Roadmap/Planning
Status: Done
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@cescoffier