Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

doc: add multi stage build to the native guide #2859

Merged

Conversation

loicmathieu
Copy link
Contributor

This adds some documentation to the native guide to show how to generate a native image using a multi-stage docker build.
It refers to this discussion : #2814

@machi1990
Copy link
Member

@loicmathieu Nice. Maybe add a note on the minimum required docker version to run multistage build?

@loicmathieu
Copy link
Contributor Author

@machi1990 it's Docker 17.05 ... two years old, maybe it's not worth specifying it ...

Copy link
Member

@gsmet gsmet left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

We would need one of our container guy to review that but I added a few suggestions on the wording.

@geoand could you take a look and check it's sufficiently clear?

docs/src/main/asciidoc/building-native-image-guide.adoc Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/src/main/asciidoc/building-native-image-guide.adoc Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/src/main/asciidoc/building-native-image-guide.adoc Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/src/main/asciidoc/building-native-image-guide.adoc Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@geoand
Copy link
Contributor

geoand commented Jun 17, 2019

@gsmet Sure thing, I will check it later on tonight

@loicmathieu loicmathieu force-pushed the feat/document_multi_stage_build branch 2 times, most recently from 1a3ae56 to a9b5c81 Compare June 18, 2019 08:14
@loicmathieu loicmathieu force-pushed the feat/document_multi_stage_build branch from a9b5c81 to f134fcd Compare June 18, 2019 09:05
Copy link
Contributor

@geoand geoand left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, @gsmet ?

@FroMage
Copy link
Member

FroMage commented Jun 19, 2019

The changes appear to have been made, can you re-review @gsmet ?

@FroMage FroMage requested a review from gsmet June 19, 2019 08:24
@loicmathieu loicmathieu force-pushed the feat/document_multi_stage_build branch from f134fcd to 150bf14 Compare June 25, 2019 10:04
@loicmathieu
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hello, I rebase on master as the native doc guide changes.
@gsmet this is now ready again to be merged.

@emmanuelbernard emmanuelbernard added this to the 0.19.0 milestone Jun 26, 2019
@emmanuelbernard emmanuelbernard removed the request for review from gsmet June 26, 2019 13:59
@emmanuelbernard
Copy link
Member

@gsmet I went ahead and merged in master, probably worth having it in 0.18?

@emmanuelbernard emmanuelbernard merged commit 227c8dd into quarkusio:master Jun 26, 2019
@loicmathieu loicmathieu deleted the feat/document_multi_stage_build branch June 26, 2019 14:01
@gsmet gsmet modified the milestones: 0.19.0, 0.18.0 Jun 26, 2019
@gsmet
Copy link
Member

gsmet commented Jun 26, 2019

@emmanuelbernard I cherry-picked it to the 0.18 branch.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants