Use RestEasy Reactive instead of classic in the extension's IT #38145
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
quarkus-bot
bot
added
area/devtools
geoand
approved these changes
Jan 11, 2024
gastaldi
added
the
triage/waiting-for-ci
gastaldi
force-pushed
the
ext_resteasy
branch
from
3ca20d2
to
b276c8d
Compare
quarkus-bot
bot
removed
the
triage/waiting-for-ci
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When creating a new extension using
quarkus create extensioncommand, the integration-tests use RestEasy Classic. This changes to use RestEasy Reactive instead