Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix StorkClientRequestFilter exception handling #39731

Conversation

damianorenfer
Copy link
Contributor

Exceptions were not caught properly because a Uni subscription was done outside a try-catch block.

@damianorenfer damianorenfer force-pushed the fix/resteasy-StorkClientRequestFilter-exception-handling branch 2 times, most recently from b4818e8 to d40f0e8 Compare March 27, 2024 12:22
@geoand geoand requested a review from aureamunoz March 27, 2024 15:04
@damianorenfer damianorenfer force-pushed the fix/resteasy-StorkClientRequestFilter-exception-handling branch 2 times, most recently from 13f87a7 to 0058eff Compare March 27, 2024 15:44
Copy link
Member

@aureamunoz aureamunoz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good catch! Thank you. LGTM. Let's see what CI says

@damianorenfer damianorenfer force-pushed the fix/resteasy-StorkClientRequestFilter-exception-handling branch 2 times, most recently from b3fcc26 to 7f59def Compare March 28, 2024 18:53
@quarkus-bot

This comment has been minimized.

@aureamunoz
Copy link
Member

cc @damianorenfer Could you please run the build or format command to have a proper code and then push it again?

@damianorenfer damianorenfer force-pushed the fix/resteasy-StorkClientRequestFilter-exception-handling branch from 7f59def to bf01d15 Compare April 1, 2024 14:23
@damianorenfer
Copy link
Contributor Author

Done, thanks!

@damianorenfer damianorenfer force-pushed the fix/resteasy-StorkClientRequestFilter-exception-handling branch 4 times, most recently from 9a554b3 to 59189e7 Compare April 3, 2024 09:29
@quarkus-bot

This comment has been minimized.

@damianorenfer damianorenfer force-pushed the fix/resteasy-StorkClientRequestFilter-exception-handling branch from 59189e7 to 61699ac Compare April 3, 2024 11:36
@quarkus-bot

This comment has been minimized.

@quarkus-bot

This comment has been minimized.

Exceptions were not caught properly because a Uni subscription was done
outside a try-catch block.
@damianorenfer damianorenfer force-pushed the fix/resteasy-StorkClientRequestFilter-exception-handling branch from 61699ac to 04cffc5 Compare April 4, 2024 08:21
@geoand geoand added the triage/waiting-for-ci Ready to merge when CI successfully finishes label Apr 4, 2024
@quarkus-bot
Copy link

quarkus-bot bot commented Apr 4, 2024

Status for workflow Quarkus CI

This is the status report for running Quarkus CI on commit 04cffc5.

✅ The latest workflow run for the pull request has completed successfully.

It should be safe to merge provided you have a look at the other checks in the summary.

You can consult the Develocity build scans.

@cescoffier cescoffier merged commit 7095bee into quarkusio:main Apr 4, 2024
31 checks passed
@quarkus-bot quarkus-bot bot removed the triage/waiting-for-ci Ready to merge when CI successfully finishes label Apr 4, 2024
@quarkus-bot quarkus-bot bot added this to the 3.10 - main milestone Apr 4, 2024
@gsmet
Copy link
Member

gsmet commented Apr 4, 2024

Thanks for this work, we will get it backported to the next 3.9.

@damianorenfer
Copy link
Contributor Author

Awesome thanks, can you also backport it to 3.8 (LTS)? Or should I do it?

@gsmet
Copy link
Member

gsmet commented Apr 9, 2024

I marked it for backport to 3.8 too but we need some bake time in 3.9 first.

@gsmet gsmet modified the milestones: 3.10 - main, 3.9.3 Apr 9, 2024
@gsmet gsmet modified the milestones: 3.9.3, 3.8.5 May 15, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants