Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Does pcap2qlog support gQUIC ? #1

Open
PercyLau opened this issue Mar 20, 2020 · 1 comment
Open

Does pcap2qlog support gQUIC ? #1

PercyLau opened this issue Mar 20, 2020 · 1 comment

Comments

@PercyLau
Copy link

PercyLau commented Mar 20, 2020

Hi, there!

Thank you for developing the analysis tool of quic protocol. Just wondering whether this pcap2qlog converter supports gQUIC as well as IETF QUIC?

I just run the script as the follows.
/projects/pcap2qlog$ sudo node ./out/main.js --input=./input_dir/quic.pcap --tshark=~/projects/wireshark/run/tshark

and I got an error in the generated qlog file:

{
"qlog_version": "draft-01",
"description": "",
"traces": [
{
"error_description": "TypeError: Cannot read property 'quic.scid' of undefined",
"uri": "./input_dir/ming.pcap"
}
]
}

Sincerely,
Percy

@rmarx
Copy link
Member

rmarx commented Mar 20, 2020

Hello Percy,

Sadly, no, we currently don't support gQUIC (and, to be honest, we probably are a bit flaky on IETF QUIC by this point as well, though it should still work for most things).

I don't plan to support gQUIC either, because it is slowly evolving towards IETF QUIC anyway and will eventually go out of use completely.

That being said: there is really no rocket science here... you mainly need to copy the correct fields from the tshark JSON output into a qlog-compliant format. It should be easy enough to do for the basic gQUIC stuff. I know that's probably not what you wanted to hear, but I don't have time to work on a gQUIC transformer myself at this time. I would of course accept PRs ;)

More feedback on pcap2qlog for IETF QUIC or the qvis toolset is of course always welcome as well!

With best regards,
Robin

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants