Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Running out of NEW_CONNECTION_ID #1163

Closed
martinthomson opened this issue Mar 5, 2018 · 3 comments
Closed

Running out of NEW_CONNECTION_ID #1163

martinthomson opened this issue Mar 5, 2018 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
-transport editorial An issue that does not affect the design of the protocol; does not require consensus.

Comments

@martinthomson
Copy link
Member

@mirjak asked what happens if you need to send using a different connection ID, but you ran out the supply from your peer?

I think that it is possible to adopt two policies: either favour continuity at the expense of linkability, or favour unlinkability at the expense of continuing the session. We should explain this trade-off somewhere. We should also encourage the provision of an ample supply of connection IDs.

@martinthomson martinthomson added editorial An issue that does not affect the design of the protocol; does not require consensus. -transport labels Mar 5, 2018
@mikkelfj
Copy link
Contributor

mikkelfj commented Mar 5, 2018

There is also the DoS concern, forcing routing state both at endpoint and middleware.

@janaiyengar
Copy link
Contributor

Discussed at editors' meeting. An endpoint can receive and process packets ok even if it doesn't have a new connection ID to use in response to a new one received. When it is about to send however, it needs to have a new connection ID (as per Section 6.7.1). If the endpoint doesn't have a new connection ID to use, we think the endpoint should immediately drop all connection state and respond to the packet with a stateless reset.

@martinthomson
Copy link
Member Author

See conclusion in #1276.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
-transport editorial An issue that does not affect the design of the protocol; does not require consensus.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants