Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

semantic rule substeps need to be ordered according their length of dependencies #3

Closed
r0ller opened this issue Oct 2, 2014 · 1 comment
Closed

semantic rule substeps need to be ordered according their length of dependencies #3

r0ller opened this issue Oct 2, 2014 · 1 comment

Comments

@r0ller
Copy link
Owner

r0ller commented Oct 2, 2014

Currently, in each step, one substep is expected to get executed in case the step itself not being optional. If there are e.g. two substeps where the first one has less dependencies than the other, that can be validated in the current interpretation, then the interpretation stops checking further in is_valid_combination() after the successful validation of the first one. The workaround is to enter the substeps in a way that the substep with the longest number of dependencies comes first and then the rest in descending order.
@r0ller
Copy link
Owner Author

r0ller commented Dec 4, 2014

Not relevant, as stepping in rule_to_rule_map got redesigned to allow both positive and negative branching while substeps aren't used any more.

@r0ller r0ller closed this as completed Dec 4, 2014
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@r0ller