Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

One line revert to patch: 41fd4f3a5e0c6d4ca0ef822b168bf33a5c9068a6 #2153

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

LeifAndersen
Copy link
Member

The docs had an erroneous 'only, probably from development, that should
be removed.

The docs had an erroneous 'only, probably from development, that should
be removed.
@@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ identifier, the @racket[exn:fail:contract] exception is raised.

@defproc[(local-expand [stx any/c]
[context-v (or/c 'expression 'top-level 'module 'module-begin list?)]
[stop-ids (or/c (listof identifier?) (cons/c 'only (listof identifier?)) #f)]
[stop-ids (or/c (listof identifier?) empty #f)]
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I’d just remove the empty special case altogether. It is subsumed by the (listof identifier?) contract, and with other changes, an empty list is less special than it used to be. I think documenting it separately is just confusing.

@mflatt
Copy link
Member

mflatt commented Dec 4, 2018

I think the change that this PR changes has gone away – right @lexi-lambda?

@lexi-lambda
Copy link
Member

Yes, I think you’re right.

@mflatt mflatt closed this Dec 4, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants