Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Move content from the Racket2 wiki entry to this repository #26

Closed
jeapostrophe opened this issue Jul 17, 2019 · 7 comments
Closed

Move content from the Racket2 wiki entry to this repository #26

jeapostrophe opened this issue Jul 17, 2019 · 7 comments

Comments

@jeapostrophe
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@gus-massa
Copy link

Link for the lazy https://github.com/racket/racket/wiki/Racket2

What is the idea? Move each one to a new issue? Many of them have already been copied. Perhaps we can add a link in the item in the wiki to the issue when it makes sense. It's not a 1-to-1 correspondence, but the first is included in #22

Another question: What about minor changes, for example I'd like to force that the last argument of append is a list? too. I'm worried to have a million of tiny proposals.

@jeapostrophe
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I think that issues and RFCs here are more trackable that the Wiki. I literally think everything on the wiki should move over. For little things, I think they should be included as notes in a general "clean up library interfaces" task

@spdegabrielle
Copy link
Member

@jeapostrophe I'm happy to move each item on https://github.com/racket/racket/wiki/Racket2 to individual issues on https://github.com/racket/racket2-rfcs

Do you think these issues need labels to distinguish the differnet sorts? e.g. 'create an rfc', feature wishlist(form the Racket2 wiki page), and administration issues like this #26 ?

@spdegabrielle
Copy link
Member

@jeapostrophe I created the ones with known authors:

@spdegabrielle
Copy link
Member

@jeapostrophe the older entries have been moved to a single issue #33 and the wiki page changed to let contributors know they should use this repo

@jeapostrophe
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Thank you! @spdegabrielle

@spdegabrielle
Copy link
Member

@jeapostrophe if you are happy please close this issue.
kind regards
Stephen

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants