Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jun 8, 2022. It is now read-only.

Tesseract Tuning #12

Closed
rad10 opened this issue Jan 9, 2020 · 1 comment · Fixed by #19
Closed

Tesseract Tuning #12

rad10 opened this issue Jan 9, 2020 · 1 comment · Fixed by #19
Labels
bug Something isn't working enhancement New feature or request question Further information is requested

Comments

@rad10
Copy link
Owner

rad10 commented Jan 9, 2020

So looking further into the configs of tesseract, there may be a way to make tesseract do most of the work for me. It has configs for limiting what characters can be read by the program, but it can also try to search for patterns. It also has the ability to include wordlists with words that may be found in the image.
I tried to work with this in Python-OutdatedTessExperiment But results didnt fairly show. The program ran faster, but as a horrendous loss in accuracy. In my experiements, I have never seen any proper difference between using and not using the wordlists or patterns. I may have been doing it wrong. If anyone reading has any experience with tesseracts wordlists, try and see if you could get it working. Currently, I'm treating it as a dead end.
If this can be implemented, then it may improve or even solve issues #6 and #11

@rad10 rad10 added bug Something isn't working enhancement New feature or request question Further information is requested labels Jan 9, 2020
@rad10
Copy link
Owner Author

rad10 commented Jan 9, 2020

Notes on thid topic:
Tesseract - CONFIG FILES AND AUGMENTING WITH USER DATA

@rad10 rad10 mentioned this issue Mar 30, 2020
@rad10 rad10 linked a pull request Mar 30, 2020 that will close this issue
@rad10 rad10 closed this as completed in #19 Mar 30, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
bug Something isn't working enhancement New feature or request question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant