-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 60
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
SO_ATTACH_REUSEPORT_CBPF option for socket #97
Comments
Interesting, looks like it couldn't hurt.. http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/socket.7.html
I don't fully understand if OSC would stand to gain much, from the slides it appears that it's for very heavy UDP traffic. I guess it could, depending on the user. But as long as it doesn't hurt anything and could make things better, I see little reason not to try it. I suppose I might want to test with several liblo-using applications to make sure there aren't any adverse effects. |
SO_REUSEPORT doesn't play nice on windows, so maybe it could be just for macos/linux. ++ |
well it seems complicated... one should open BPF device for read-write access, put the filtering and attach it to an interface ('en0', 'lo0', etc...). ++ |
Hi,
In this document: https://www.slideshare.net/lfevents/boost-udp-transaction-performance
author is considering the use of SO_ATTACH_REUSEPORT_CBPF for sockets in order to speed UDP transaction.
Is it something we can benefit?
++
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: