Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Lock sprockets to 2.2.x #8161

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Nov 9, 2012

Conversation

guilleiguaran
Copy link
Member

Rails is failing with sprockets >= 2.3, see #8099 for reference and discussion.

I think we should address the issue anyway and relax the dependency again later but right now this is being a blocker for 3.2.9 release since last week.

We isolated the problem to sass-rails but we don't have much idea right now about how to fix it

rafaelfranca added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 9, 2012
Lock sprockets to 2.2.x

REASON: We had some pending fixes in sprockets and sass-rails to make possible to use sprockets version > 2.2. We will do a more conservative sprockets upgrade for this release.

In a next release we can relax the dependency again.

See #8099 for more information.
@rafaelfranca rafaelfranca merged commit 68e001f into rails:3-2-stable Nov 9, 2012
rafaelfranca added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 9, 2012
Lock sprockets to 2.2.x

REASON: We had some pending fixes in sprockets and sass-rails to make possible to use sprockets version > 2.2. We will do a more conservative sprockets upgrade for this release.

In a next release we can relax the dependency again.

See #8099 for more information.
@jeremy
Copy link
Member

jeremy commented Nov 9, 2012

But this forces 3.2.8 apps on newer sprockets to downgrade when they upgrade to 3.2.9.

@rafaelfranca
Copy link
Member

3.2.8 depends on sprockets ~> 2.1.3 so they don't have to downgrade

@guilleiguaran
Copy link
Member Author

confirm, 3.2.8 is depending in 2.1.3

@jeremy
Copy link
Member

jeremy commented Nov 9, 2012

Great! I thought 83e0c95 was applied before release.

@judofyr
Copy link

judofyr commented May 13, 2013

Why is Sprockets still locked now that #8099 is fixed?

@judofyr
Copy link

judofyr commented May 13, 2013

Ah, nevermind. I see that the Sprockets-dependency has been pulled into sprockets-rails in Rails 4.

@KDGundermann
Copy link

What about Rails 3.2.x apps ? As #8099 is solved, shouldn't they also use the latest sprockets version 2.9.x ?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants