Log instrumentation name for exists? queries #1823
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Looks good. @tenderlove do you mind picking this in? (If all the tests passed?) |
|
Nice find! haha |
ghost
assigned
jake3030
pushed a commit
to jake3030/rails
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 28, 2011
…ven after a call to session_reset [rails#1823 state:resolved] Signed-off-by: Joshua Peek <josh@joshpeek.com>
spastorino
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 11, 2011
Log instrumentation name for exists? queries
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hi,
I noticed that as of 3.1 exists? queries stopped reporting an instrumentation name in their log entry. Here's a proposed patch for that.
Thanks,
Jon
Ruby Agent Engineer
New Relic