Better proc/lambda route representation in bin/rails routes
#43787
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Before: <Proc:RandomObjectId "/full/path/to/config/routes"> After: "Inline handler (Proc/Lambda)"
skyksandr
changed the title
bin/rails routes
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Change proc defined route representation from:
To:
We are using result of
bin/rails routesinspection in CI automations. We recently added proc defined/healthendpoint and found out that the result ofbin/rails routesnow changes on every run.Looking deeper I confirmed that this is a result of
.inspectcall and added a condition forProcsOther Information
Feedback is greatly appreciated.