Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SolidQueue::ReadyExecution error #130

Closed
rctneil opened this issue Jan 18, 2024 · 4 comments
Closed

SolidQueue::ReadyExecution error #130

rctneil opened this issue Jan 18, 2024 · 4 comments

Comments

@rctneil
Copy link

rctneil commented Jan 18, 2024

Hi,

When running Solid Queue with all default config I get:

/gems/solid_queue-0.1.2/lib/solid_queue/worker.rb:35:in block in poll': uninitialized constant SolidQueue::ReadyExecution (NameError)
21:27:46 jobs.1 |
21:27:46 jobs.1 | SolidQueue::ReadyExecution.claim(queues, pool.idle_threads, process.id)
21:27:46 jobs.1 | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
21:27:46 jobs.1 | Did you mean? SolidQueue::FailedExecution`

Any suggestions?

@namolnad
Copy link
Contributor

I just went through this yesterday. I think this generally happens on code reloads. You'll need to update to v0.2.0 (for which you'll need to point to github vs rubygems: #129). Fix was here: #82

@rctneil
Copy link
Author

rctneil commented Jan 18, 2024

I just went through this yesterday. I think this generally happens on code reloads. You'll need to update to v0.2.0 (for which you'll need to point to github vs rubygems: #129). Fix was here: #82

Awesome! Thanks. I will for sure give this a try tomorrow.

@rosa
Copy link
Member

rosa commented Jan 19, 2024

Oops, so sorry! Not publishing that to RubyGems was an oversight (I was sure I had published it 🤦‍♀️ ). Since we target main in our apps, I didn't notice. I'll publish it ASAP.

@rosa
Copy link
Member

rosa commented Jan 19, 2024

Done!

@rosa rosa closed this as completed Jan 19, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants