Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Somehow load_{be,le} of integer without offset doesn't work #4080

Closed
randombit opened this issue May 29, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #4085
Closed

Somehow load_{be,le} of integer without offset doesn't work #4080

randombit opened this issue May 29, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #4085

Comments

@randombit
Copy link
Owner

In most cases it doesn't matter much but when there is a lone load_be(array, 0) it would be nicer if we could omit the index.

#4056 (comment)

@reneme can you take a look?

@reneme
Copy link
Collaborator

reneme commented May 29, 2024

The index may be omitted when actually passing an array. In the case at hand we did try to pass a raw pointer, though. This overload does not exist. #4085 switches to using a range-based overload.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants