Replies: 1 comment 2 replies
-
@rzw so you're concluding the .exe build is rather unusual and most likely not widely used? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
2 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Regarding windows there are three options to run the program
All files are more or less the same size which obviously(?) means that the standalone sleek-1.3.1-win.exe unpacks in volatile memory/RAM, which is why it takes longer to start up the application. Of course there are many applications with standalone exe's. But I haven't seen this as an option besides setup and archive. So I thought I'd mention it here.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions