-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 26
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Q: Compute complete Betweenness Centrality #43
Comments
And unrelated to this question something else, I was redirected to this repository with my question, as the original Hornet is seemingly not maintained anymore, but it seems the current state of the repository does not build. Should this repository be useable at the moment as a public repository? Or should I stick with the original? |
I will start off with the 2nd comment\question by saying that the "getting started" documentation for this repo needs to be updated. To build this repo, please visit: https://rapids.ai/start.html. You will need to use conda packages to get rmm working. The three so called variants of BC are actually two variants: exact and approximate.
|
Thank you very much, I got it to run with this description. 😄 |
TL:DR: What is the difference between the three variants of BC and how can one compute the complete BC for a graph (like in Hybrid_BC)?
I have a few questions regarding computing the BC of a graph.
It seems there are three variants in the repository:
BCCentrality
ExactBC
ApproximateBC
What is the difference between these three variants, a few of them are out-commented in the
BCTest.cu
, hence I'm not completely sure if they are working as of now?Furthermore, as far as I can see, these algorithms seem to require a root node to be passed, does this mean that I'd have to sequentially call the algorithms for all nodes in a graph to actually compute the BC?
I guess internally, some form of Brandes is done, hence does this mean that by passing a root node, only a partial BC result is computed, looking at all paths from this given root node?
Could I then simply do something like this:
or is there a canonical approach to compute the BC for a graph I'm missing?
Thanks very much! 😄
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: