Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

question about bbox and mask #22

Closed
smoothumut opened this issue Jul 4, 2022 · 2 comments
Closed

question about bbox and mask #22

smoothumut opened this issue Jul 4, 2022 · 2 comments

Comments

@smoothumut
Copy link

smoothumut commented Jul 4, 2022

Thanks again for this great work. I am still trying to make it work for our case. In order to run the model with our custom dataset, should we need to have bbox and mask in our bop formatted custom dataset? we can provide bbox_visible but not bbox. and we can provide mask_visible but not mask? how important are they? would be bbox_visible and mask_visible enough?
if we need them for this model, do you have any idea how to generate that ?
thanks thanks in advance

@rasmushaugaard
Copy link
Owner

The full mask is found by rendering the object in the ground truth pose during training.
You don't need to provide bbox and mask, but you would probably need to remove the "bbox_obj" from surfemb/data/instance.py.

@smoothumut
Copy link
Author

thanks a lot for the answer. Deeply appreciated

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants