Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add BaseField methods for IN and NOT IN operations #41

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Apr 7, 2020
Merged

Conversation

rbw
Copy link
Owner

@rbw rbw commented Apr 6, 2020

Adds the in_list, not_in_list methods to BaseField, making it available to all Field types.

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Apr 6, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #41 into master will decrease coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 0.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##           master     #41      +/-   ##
=========================================
- Coverage    0.28%   0.27%   -0.01%     
=========================================
  Files          34      35       +1     
  Lines         713     715       +2     
=========================================
  Hits            2       2              
- Misses        711     713       +2     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
snow/resource/fields/_utils.py 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
snow/resource/fields/base.py 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
snow/resource/fields/choice.py 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 2f838a0...fba34cc. Read the comment docs.

@rbw rbw merged commit 9deace7 into master Apr 7, 2020
@rbw rbw deleted the enable-query-in branch April 7, 2020 21:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

IN and NOT IN operators not implemented for Numeric field
2 participants