Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

flowerSexuality #20

Closed
pzermoglio opened this issue Dec 7, 2020 · 4 comments
Closed

flowerSexuality #20

pzermoglio opened this issue Dec 7, 2020 · 4 comments

Comments

@pzermoglio
Copy link

Field Value
GUID
Rebipp Class rebipp:FlowerTrait
Label flowerSexuality
Definition The sexuality of the flower which this Interaction was recorded regarding to the presence of both (bisexual) stamens (male organs) and pistils (carpels) (female organs), or unisexual, with only male (staminate flower) or female (pistillate or carpellate flower) functional organs.
Comments
Examples 'bisexual', 'male', 'female'
Controlled vocabulary bisexual, male, female
Darwin Core Class Occurrence
Cardinality One to one
Reference Protocol
@fonturbel
Copy link

I suggest the following controlled vocabulary: monoecious (male); monoecious (female); dioecious

This was referenced Jan 19, 2021
@Mardiore
Copy link

The definition is confusing. I suggest: The sexuality is based in the presence of the fertile whorls within the flower, may be bisexual, with both stamens (male organs) and pistils (carpels) (female organs), or unisexual, with only male (staminate flower) or female (pistillate or carpellate flower) functional organs.

I suggest to Examples and to Controlled vocabulary: Bisexual, Staminate flower and Pistillate flowers. These terms are more used in the literature (in the area of anatomy, for example, the terms male and female are usually not employed).

@Mardiore
Copy link

I suggest the following controlled vocabulary: monoecious (male); monoecious (female); dioecious

The definition is related to the sexual expression of the flower and not of the individual of a population.

@zedomel
Copy link
Contributor

zedomel commented Mar 10, 2021

Accepted @Mardiore suggestion to the controlled vocabulary. The definition will be merged too.

@zedomel zedomel closed this as completed Mar 10, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants