Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(deps): update dependency yargs to v16 #164

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 4, 2020
Merged

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Sep 9, 2020

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change
yargs (source) dependencies major ^15.0.0 -> ^16.0.0

Release Notes

yargs/yargs

v16.1.0

Compare Source

Features
Bug Fixes
16.0.3 (2020-09-10)
Bug Fixes
16.0.2 (2020-09-09)
Bug Fixes
16.0.1 (2020-09-09)
Bug Fixes

v16.0.3

Compare Source

v16.0.2

Compare Source

v16.0.1

Compare Source

v16.0.0

Compare Source

⚠ BREAKING CHANGES
  • tweaks to ESM/Deno API surface: now exports yargs function by default; getProcessArgvWithoutBin becomes hideBin; types now exported for Deno.
  • find-up replaced with escalade; export map added (limits importable files in Node >= 12); yarser-parser@19.x.x (new decamelize/camelcase implementation).
  • usage: single character aliases are now shown first in help output
  • rebase helper is no longer provided on yargs instance.
  • drop support for EOL Node 8 (#​1686)
Features
Bug Fixes

Renovate configuration

📅 Schedule: At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

♻️ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by WhiteSource Renovate. View repository job log here.

@mwcz mwcz merged commit 64dd001 into master Nov 4, 2020
@renovate renovate bot deleted the renovate/yargs-16.x branch November 4, 2020 20:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants