Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

API doesn't support byte[] #28

Closed
spullara opened this issue Oct 3, 2010 · 4 comments
Closed

API doesn't support byte[] #28

spullara opened this issue Oct 3, 2010 · 4 comments

Comments

@spullara
Copy link

spullara commented Oct 3, 2010

I'm trying to use this to store serialized objects but the lack of raw byte[] support makes that difficult. Are you planning on support raw byte[]?

@xetorthio
Copy link
Contributor

Hi. Yes. I'm planning to add this. Actually I had lots of requests regard this (myself included). So expect this to be available in the next couple of days.

@spullara
Copy link
Author

spullara commented Oct 3, 2010

Ah great news, thanks!

@spullara
Copy link
Author

spullara commented Oct 3, 2010

BTW, really nice job on the client. Very clean code, easy to understand. One other thing that you might think about is making the List results streaming in the cases where that makes sense. For example, I could start processing the results of keys() before all of them have been read by the server and they would never have to completely fit in memory.

@xetorthio
Copy link
Contributor

This was pushed to master and will be available as of 1.4.0

This issue was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants