Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Scottx611x/expose extra directories #2447

Merged
merged 8 commits into from Dec 19, 2017

Conversation

scottx611x
Copy link
Member

@scottx611x scottx611x commented Dec 19, 2017

@mccalluc Please review/merge #2446 Before this one

  • Add extra_directories information to input.json

Note: Heatmap Scatterplot Tool launches properly with these changes, but we run into the relative paths issue again (when specifying a relative path in a VisTool things get routed through Refinery instead of the proxy) . We should really begin looking into using subdomain based routing for Vis Tools

@scottx611x scottx611x added this to the Release 1.6.2 milestone Dec 19, 2017
self.NODE_INFORMATION: self._get_detailed_input_nodes_dict(),
ToolDefinition.EXTRA_DIRECTORIES: (
self.tool_definition.get_extra_directories()
)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think you need the surrounding paren here: There's no syntactic ambiguity without it.

self.NODE_INFORMATION: self._get_detailed_input_nodes_dict(),
ToolDefinition.EXTRA_DIRECTORIES: (
self.tool_definition.get_extra_directories()
)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think this should block, but the mix of self and ToolDefinition, or public and underscored confuses me, a little. Are those distinctions useful, and meaningful?

@scottx611x
Copy link
Member Author

Failing build See: #2348

@scottx611x scottx611x merged commit 6a87bd7 into develop Dec 19, 2017
@scottx611x scottx611x deleted the scottx611x/expose_extra_directories branch December 19, 2017 20:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants