Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert "use process pool to compile faster (#2377)" #2434

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jan 22, 2024

Conversation

picklelo
Copy link
Contributor

We will bring this back after the release.

@picklelo picklelo merged commit f513f4c into main Jan 22, 2024
41 of 43 checks passed
@picklelo picklelo deleted the nikhil/revert-compile branch January 30, 2024 03:08
jackie-pc added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 31, 2024
jackie-pc added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 13, 2024
masenf added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 5, 2024
masenf added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 12, 2024
masenf added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 13, 2024
masenf added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 16, 2024
* Revert "Revert "Revert "Revert "use process pool to compile faster (#2377)" (#2434)" (#2497)" (#2595)"

This reverts commit 6b6eea4.

* Adjust number of operations for more correct progress bar

* app: recognize REFLEX_COMPILE_PROCESSES and REFLEX_COMPILE_THREADS

Control whether multiprocessing is used and the number of processes or threads
that should be used.

This will allow users to opt-in to the new, potentially hazardous,
multiprocessing mode, which results in much faster compiles, but has already
been reverted 4 times. Lets leave the code in this time, but use the thread
pool executor by default.

Limiting the number of threads or processes to 1 can also aid in debugging
issues that arise during compile time.

* Allow REFLEX_COMPILE_PROCESSES=0 to trigger multiprocessing with auto workers
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants