Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert "Revert "use process pool to compile faster (#2377)" (#2434)" #2497

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 31, 2024

Conversation

jackie-pc
Copy link
Contributor

Bring this back into main so we can dogfood / trigger potential issues with shutdown x subprocess terminations

@picklelo picklelo merged commit 80dce21 into main Jan 31, 2024
45 checks passed
@masenf masenf deleted the jackie-fast-compile-try-again branch February 8, 2024 18:31
jackie-pc added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 13, 2024
masenf added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 5, 2024
masenf added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 12, 2024
masenf added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 13, 2024
masenf added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 16, 2024
* Revert "Revert "Revert "Revert "use process pool to compile faster (#2377)" (#2434)" (#2497)" (#2595)"

This reverts commit 6b6eea4.

* Adjust number of operations for more correct progress bar

* app: recognize REFLEX_COMPILE_PROCESSES and REFLEX_COMPILE_THREADS

Control whether multiprocessing is used and the number of processes or threads
that should be used.

This will allow users to opt-in to the new, potentially hazardous,
multiprocessing mode, which results in much faster compiles, but has already
been reverted 4 times. Lets leave the code in this time, but use the thread
pool executor by default.

Limiting the number of threads or processes to 1 can also aid in debugging
issues that arise during compile time.

* Allow REFLEX_COMPILE_PROCESSES=0 to trigger multiprocessing with auto workers
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants