Inline annotations in files with spell-check issues

[spier]

hi @reitermarkus and thanks for this nice Action.

I am new to aspell but I am using a couple of other GitHub Actions already in https://github.com/InnerSourceCommons/InnerSourcePatterns.

I already got your Action to run in this experiment, so far so good :)
InnerSourceCommons/InnerSourcePatterns#272

Right now the output of aspell is only available in the logs.

I am wondering if it would be possible to create inline annotations in files that have spell-check issues?
That way it would be easier for PR authors to spot where the issue is and fix it.

Any pointers would be appreciated.

[reitermarkus]

The annotations should already show up in the Files tab in pull requests, don't they?

[spier]

You are right, it already works.
Not sure where I was looking the last time.

Now I see inline annotations like this:

Will close the issue.

[spier]

One other related question if I may:
In the meantime I found this other action rojopolis/spellcheck-github-actions which is a wrapper around PySpelling, which in turn uses aspell as I understand.

Was just curious if you have seen that other action and what you think about the pros/cons of the PySpelling wrapper when compared to using aspell directly? Not saying that one is better than the other, just interested in learning more about the use cases for both of them as this is my first time trying to automate any sort of spell-checking.

[reitermarkus]

No, I haven't seen PySpelling or the other action before, so I can't comment on which use cases they might be used for.

[spier]

Ok. No problem and thanks for the quick responses.
I already learned a bit more about spell checking today at least :)