Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

On the next generation network protocol #30

Open
yzazzx2021 opened this issue Feb 4, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

On the next generation network protocol #30

yzazzx2021 opened this issue Feb 4, 2022 · 1 comment

Comments

@yzazzx2021
Copy link

Dear author. Thank you for bringing such a convenient web file sharing server to the Internet,But now there is a big problem in the server, that is, the global public network IPv4 has been exhausted.At present, most broadband service providers always use nat-ipv4 to enable multiple users to share a public IPv4 address,Because dynamic DNS can only be realized on the basis that users directly hold a dynamic public network IPv4,Therefore, now individual users cannot use dynamic DNS to share their files with the outside world
However, now the new version 6 network protocol has become more and more mature, which has perfectly solved the problem of depletion of IPv4 in the global public network.
However, the new version 6 network protocol has become more and more mature, which has perfectly solved the problem of depletion of IPv4 in the global public network. At this stage, most of the leading broadband service providers have access to IPv6 network and promised to assign no less than / 60 prefix to individual users. However, some backward small broadband service providers have not yet access to IPv6 network, Therefore, I suggest that you should support dual protocol stack as soon as possible, that is, both V4 and V6. It not only facilitates the use of individual users who do not have public network V4 but have public network V6, but also facilitates users with only V4 network access to access the sharing stations provided by their friends.

@rejetto
Copy link
Owner

rejetto commented Feb 4, 2022

hi, did you try 2.4 ?
https://github.com/rejetto/hfs2/releases/tag/v2.4-rc07
i attempted ipv6 support there.
sadly i don't have an ipv6 ISP, so i cannot make tests myself.

also, HFS 3 is on its way and it supposed also to support ipv6.
https://github.com/rejetto/hfs/releases

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants