-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 65
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Wrong date_time with EXIF 2.2 #8
Comments
EXIF reader can not read PNG images. |
I'm aware of that. These PNG's are just screenshots of two info-windows, containing the EXIF-info. |
I'll need to original images to figure out what is wrong. |
Correct: http://jpunt.nl/tmp/IMG_2821.JPG |
IMG_2822.JPG: Apparently some application changed the "date_time" time stamp on that image after some kind of edit (adjusted contrast or something simular?). The original is still intact; "date_time_original". You should use that instead for the date the picture was taken. |
ah great, I didn't know date_time_original was a method. Thanks! |
I'm developing an image-gallery and I want to sort pictures by the date/time the photo was shot. This seems to be working great using this awesome gem, but after digging a bit deeper I found out that a lot of photos are getting the wrong date. The only difference between them (as far as I can find) is that some photo's are using EXIF 2.2 and some are using EXIF 2.2.1. The 2.2.1-ones are given the correct date/time, the 2.2 are getting a two-days-delay. Opening them in some basic photo-software results in the correct date, but slight differences in EXIF-data:
http://jpunt.nl/tmp/exif2.2.png
http://jpunt.nl/tmp/exif2.2.1.png
Any ideas on this?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: