You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hey, I'm still new to this area, but it confuses me that parameter N in train_cifar10_search.sh is multiplied by 3 when generating model. However, in the paper, it seems that N is the total normal convolution cell used to construct final model. So I'm wondering if these two Ns are the same or is N in code equals 3 * N in the paper?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@noNameForMe1994 Hi, recent works on NAS commonly follow a pattern of: stem head - convolution cell * N - reduction cell - convolution cell * N - reduction cell - auxiliary head - convolution cell * N - reduction cell (please refer to NASNet, ENAS...). So you see there are totally N*3 convolution cells and 2 reduction cells. The N in the script is the same with the N in the paper (we use N=6 as a common practice).
Hey, I'm still new to this area, but it confuses me that parameter N in train_cifar10_search.sh is multiplied by 3 when generating model. However, in the paper, it seems that N is the total normal convolution cell used to construct final model. So I'm wondering if these two Ns are the same or is N in code equals 3 * N in the paper?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: