Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow optionally ignoring transient smtp errors #37

Closed
wants to merge 6 commits into from

Conversation

cguardia
Copy link
Contributor

Raising an exception triggers alarms in some monitoring systems, even when the message is usually delivered later. Having the option of not raising exceptions in these cases can prevent this.

Raising an exception triggers alarms in some monitoring systems, even when the message is usually delivered later. Having the option of not raising exceptions in these cases can prevent this.
Copy link
Member

@tseaver tseaver left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the patch!

  • Please add something to docs/narr.rst documenting the new ignore_transient parameter?
  • Please sign CONTRIBUTORS.txt
  • Please add an entry to CHANGES.rst.

@cguardia
Copy link
Contributor Author

cguardia commented Dec 8, 2016

@tseaver done with the requested changes, but there seems to be a conflict.

tseaver pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 8, 2016
Raising an exception triggers alarms in some monitoring systems, even when
the message is usually delivered later. Having the option of not raising
exceptions in these cases can prevent such alarms.

(Merging PR #37 after rebasing and fixing conflicts).
@tseaver
Copy link
Member

tseaver commented Dec 8, 2016

@cguardia Thanks! I've rebased your branch, squashing and fixing the conflicts.

@tseaver tseaver closed this Dec 8, 2016
@tseaver
Copy link
Member

tseaver commented Dec 8, 2016

@cguardia released

@cguardia
Copy link
Contributor Author

cguardia commented Dec 8, 2016

Thank you!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants